It’s
a simple question and one on the minds of many Madison River
anglers, but as a recent discussion with Montana’s
Whirling Disease Research Director Dick Vincent pointed
out, it’s VERY difficult to answer. The answer is
complex and a classic example of a “good news/bad
news” scenario. First, even though the Madison River
has been the poster child for severe whirling disease, the
infection in the Madison is considered moderately high.
On the MacConnell/Baldwin scale where 0 is undetectable,
5 is most severe and an infection about 2.5 causes some
mortality, the Madison infection averages around 3.5. At
this level, it is likely that the Madison will have its
good years and its bad years. Even pre-whirling disease,
the Madison had cyclical trout population peaks and valleys,
and although whirling disease (WD) is now present in the
Madison and has impacted rainbow trout populations, this
cyclical nature is likely to continue. The bad news is that
WD is still a significant problem in the upper Madison River
above Ennis Lake. The good news is that rainbow trout populations
in the Madison have rebounded significantly from the tragically
low levels of the mid-90’s and brown trout populations
today are almost exactly what they were pre-whirling disease.
Also, as those who have fished the Madison recently know,
the fishing has been respectable. The bad news is that this
rebound does not appear to be grounded in any permanent,
genetic resistance to WD, and unfortunately, the bounce
back may not be permanent.
The
Madison River is one of the most thoroughly studied trout
streams in the world. Trout populations are counted annually
and flow and temperature data, and trout life history information
have been collected over several decades. There are lots
of numbers to look at, and they can be difficult to interpret.
The following comparison of trout productivity in a 3 mile
study section in the upper Madison best illustrates what
has happened in the river since the early ‘80’s.
Time
Period Total Pounds of Rainbow Trout
Total Pounds of Brown Trout
Per
3 Mile Study Section Per
3 Mile Study Section
1982-1990(pre-WD)
5007
3905
1991-1998(WD
impact) 1320
2871 1999-2003
3259
3944
As
you can see, WD, which likely was introduced in the late
80’s, had an enormous, initial impact on the rainbow
trout population. The “rainbow biomass” dropped
from an annual average of 5007 total pounds of rainbow trout
in the 3 mile study section to a low of 1320 pounds during
the heavy infections of the mid-90’s. Even browns,
which are much more resistant to WD, appear to have suffered
an initial hit during that same period. Today, the rainbow
biomass has rebounded to an average of 3259 pounds, but
this is still well below, nearly 35% lower, than the pre-WD
levels. The brown trout biomass, on the other hand, is almost
exactly what it was in the pre-WD time period.
So,
what does this mean for upper Madison River rainbow trout?
Unfortunately, the answers are not clear. Extensive research
has produced several interesting findings. First, the rainbow
population rebound appears to be influenced by environmental
factors with flow levels being very critical. One important
study found that higher than normal flow levels at the time
of rainbow fry emergence appeared to dilute the whirling
disease infection thereby increasing survival rates. These
phenomena likely produced the sizeable rainbow trout year
classes in 1998 and 1999. Unfortunately, there are some
disturbing signs that the rainbow trout population may be
headed for another downward trend. There is data that indicates
rainbow trout growth rates are declining, and it appears
that whirling disease infections experienced by young trout
may produce lingering, debilitating effects that may cause
problems later in their lives. These are disturbing and
perplexing questions that obviously merit further study.
Yet, there is hope. Research into whirling disease resistant
rainbow trout may hold a key. This research is progressing
and combined and with other management practices, the use
of a whirling disease resistant rainbow trout may help turn
the tide in the battle to restore Madison River rainbow
trout populations to pre-WD levels. When will this happen?
Scientific research with animals takes time, and it’s
going to take a few years to get the answers. We must be
patient.
What’s
the bottom line for Madison River anglers? First, whirling
disease hasn’t done anything to change the magnificent
scenery. The upper Madison is still one of the most beautiful
places on God’s green earth. Second, even with a depressed
rainbow trout population, the browns are still there in
pre-WD numbers and along with the remaining rainbows, we
have very good fishing. Personally, I fish the upper Madison
as much as I ever did, and I will continue to fish there.
My expectations on catching rainbows of the size and in
the numbers I caught back in the 80’s have changed,
but this doesn’t diminish my enjoyment. Should we
be satisfied with the current conditions? Should we accept
them as the status quo? I think not and certainly Dick Vincent
and Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks don’t think
so either. As long as there appear to be possibilities to
manage the disease and restore the Madison River rainbow
populations to pre-WD levels, we’re obligated to keep
the whirling disease research process moving forward. So,
please enjoy the fishing treasure that is Montana’s
Madison River, and please continue to support the work of
the whirling disease research community and the Whirling
Disease Foundation.